确实很喜欢Scott Adamsçš„æ–‡å—。我想我ç†è§£ä»–æ–‡å—的能力远大于ç†è§£ä»–漫画的能力——当然,这æ£æ˜¯æˆ‘英文远弱于斯的表现。说实è¯ï¼Œå¯¹äºŽ"Dilbert",也是æ–æ–ç»ç»åœ°çœ‹ï¼›æ¯•ç«Ÿä¸æ˜¯æ¯è¯ï¼Œè€Œä¸”看漫画而没有笑æ„使我觉得自己很stupid。æ£æ˜¯ç”±äºŽè´ªä¾¿å®œçš„念头,使我在æžæ€ªç±»ä¹¦ç±å‰é¢å¯»æ‰¾äº†åŠä¸ªå°æ—¶ï¼Œè€Œç»ˆäºŽæ‰¾åˆ°äº†è¿™æœ¬$10的厚700多页的书。
一般è€ç¾Žå‡ºä¹¦éƒ½å–œæ¬¢åœ¨å°å››ï¼ˆå¤ªä¸“业了?就是å°åº•ï¼‰ä¸Šå¼•ç”¨å人对该书的评价。然而我å´åœ¨è¿™æœ¬åŽšä¹¦çš„å°å››ä¸Šæ‰¾åˆ°äº†Scott自己的è¯ï¼š
"My hope is that you will see some writing here and assume it’s a bunch of quotes from famous people complimenting the book. Well, if you think famous people have time to read books, you’re wrong."
ä½ æ€Žä¹ˆè¯„ä»·ä½ æ‰€åœ¨çš„å…¬å¸å‘¢ï¼Ÿä½ 怎么去ç†è§£å‘生在那里的一切呢?是ä¸æ˜¯å’Œæˆ‘ä¸€æ ·ï¼Œæ°¸è¿œæƒ³ä¸æ˜Žç™½ä¸ºä»€ä¹ˆè¢«promote的人会被promote?为什么åšäº†å¾ˆå¤šå¾ˆè¾›è‹¦çš„工作å´å¹¶ä¸è®¤ä¸ºå¾—到了与之相é…的报酬?是ä¸æ˜¯æ—¶å¸¸è§‰å¾—ä¸æ˜Žç™½è€æ¿åœ¨æƒ³ä»€ä¹ˆï¼Ÿè€Œä¸”还ç»å¸¸ä¸ºæ–°çš„政ç–感到ä¸è§£ï¼Ÿå¦‚æžœæ˜¯è¿™æ ·çš„ï¼Œé‚£ä½ å’Œæˆ‘ä¸€æ ·éœ€è¦ä¸€ç§æ–¹å¼æ¥è§£é‡Šè¿™äº›çŽ°è±¡ï¼Œç„¶åŽä½ 就会觉得这个世界其实éžå¸¸ç®€å•ã€‚Scottå°±æ˜¯è¿™æ ·ä¸€ä¸ªæŠŠäº‹æƒ…æƒ³å¾—å¾ˆæ˜Žç™½çš„äººã€‚è®©æˆ‘ä»¬æ¥çœ‹çœ‹ä»–是怎么é˜è¿°è¿™äº›äº‹æƒ…的:
When I first started hearing these stories I was puzzled, but after careful analysis I have developed a sophisticated theory to explain the existence of this bizarre workplace behavior: People are idiots.
Including me. Everyone is an idiot, not just the people with low SAT scores. The only differences among us is that we’re idiots about different things at different times. No matter how smart you are, you spend much of your day being an idiot. That’s the central premise of this scholarly work.
…
Scientists believe that humans are the grand result of billions of years of evolution. I can’t explain the entire theory of evolution here, but it can be summarized this way.
First, there were some amoebas. Deviant amoebas adapted better to the environment, thus becoming monkeys. Then came Total Quality Management.
…
All the technology that surrounds us, all the management theories, the economic models that predict and guide our behavior, the science that helps us live to eighty — it’s all created by a tiny percentage of deviant smart people. The rest of us are treading water as fast as we can. The world is too complex for us. Evolution didn’t keep up. … We got knowledge and technology before we got intelligence.
Scott被认为是当今地çƒä¸Šæœ€å¹½é»˜çš„人(citation needed),他的幽默真的是让人笑过之åŽå¤šæœ‰æ‰€æ€ã€‚其实Scott说得很对,我们生活的这个世界里充满了我们ä¸äº†è§£çš„东西。我们是一切ä¸ä¸ºæˆ‘们所掌æ¡çš„çŸ¥è¯†å’ŒæŠ€æœ¯çš„å® å„¿ã€‚æˆ‘ä»¬ç”Ÿæ´»ä¸æ‰€é‡åˆ°çš„形形色色的人物,都是和我们没有任何分别的普通人——会犯很多低级错误的å¯çˆ±çš„人们。如果这些还ä¸èƒ½ä½¿ä½ ç†è§£å‘生在工作ä¸çš„ç§ç§è´¹è§£è€Œå¯ç¬‘的事,那么是时候了解一下"Dilbert Principle"了。
Stories like these prompted me to do the first annual Dilbert Survey to find out what management practices were most annoying to employees. The choices included the usual suspects: Quality, Empowerment, Re-engineering and the like. But the number-one vote-getter on this highly unscientific survey was "Idiots Promoted to Management."
…
Lately, however, the Peter Principle has given way to the Dilbert Principle. The basic concept of the Dilbert Principle is that the most ineffective workers are systematically moved to the place where they can do the least damage: management. This has not proved to be the winning strategy that you might think. Â
ä¸ç®¡è®¤åŒä¸Žå¦ï¼Œéƒ½ä¸å¦¨æŠŠè¿™äº›è¯çœ‹ä½œæ˜¯ä¸ªç¬‘è¯â€”—ä¸æ˜¯å› 为æžç¬‘而好笑笑è¯ã€‚生活少ä¸äº†æ€è€ƒï¼Œè€Œæ€è€ƒçš„集大æˆè€…,其实ä¸è¿‡æ˜¯ä¸€ä¸ªç¬‘è¯ç½¢äº†ã€‚
本文相关资料:
- Dilbert strips: http://dilbert.com
- Scott Adams’s blog: http://dilbert.com/blog
- A copy of "The Dilbert Principle" published on The Wall Street Journal, 5/22/95: http://www.daviddeerfield.com//Jokes/Dilbert-principle.html
- Description of Book "The Dilbert Principle": http://www.harpercollins.com/books/9780887308581/Dilbert_Principle_The/index.aspx
- 常用排版术è¯ï¼šhttp://www.cgan.net/book/books/indesign/gb/02_1.htm